Another review of Immanuel Kant: The Very Idea of a Critique of Pure Reason has just been published on the appropriately-titled website Critique. This review (https://virtualcritique.wordpress.com/2016/11/20/michael-olson-on-colin-mcquillans-the-very-idea-of-a-critique-of-pure-reason/) is by Michael J. Olson of Macquarie University in Australia. I really appreciate Michael’s careful (and accurate!) reading of the book, as well as the methodological questions he raises. My response is here: https://virtualcritique.wordpress.com/2016/11/20/reply-to-michael-olson/
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews has just published a very interesting review of Immanuel Kant: The Very Idea of a Critique of Pure Reason by Riccardo Pozzo (National Research Council of Italy). Pozzo is one of my main interlocutors in my work on Kant’s logic, so I’m very pleased he called my Kant book an “erudite and seminal work of meticulous scholarship.”
Congratulations to St. Mary’s Ethics Bowl Team, who came in 2nd in the 19th annual Texas Regional Ethics Bowl!
I’m proud to say the members of our team worked together, thought critically on their feet, and showed real concern for morally serious problems. It’s been an honor to be their coach.
On to Nationals!
I’m happy to announce that Prof. María del Rosario Acosta López (DePaul) and I have organized a conference on the subject “Critique in German Philosophy,” which will take place November 9-12, 2017, at DePaul University in Chicago, IL.
Keynote speakers include:
- Amy Allen (Penn State)
- Karin de Boer (Leuven)
- Christoph Menke (Frankfurt am Main)
Other participants include:
- Smaranda Aldea (Dartmouth)
- G. Anthony Bruno (McGill)
- Peter Fenves (Northwestern)
- Avery Goldman (DePaul)
- Catalina González Quintero (Los Andes)
- Florian Klinger (Chicago)
- Richard A. Lee (DePaul)
- Rudolf Makkreel (Emory)
- Elizabeth Millán (DePaul)
- Angelica Nuzzo (CUNY)
- Gabriel Rockhill (Villanova)
- Rocío Zambrana (Oregon)
- Rachel Zuckert (Northwestern)
I’ll post the final program when it’s available.
For the last eight months I’ve worked with other members of the School of Humanities and Social Sciences at St. Mary’s to organize the Conference on Justice and Social Concerns. This year’s theme was “Immigration, Migration, and Refugees.” The conference included wonderful keynote lectures by Ruth Behar (Michigan) and Elizabeth Ferris (Georgetown), a presentation by artist Anne Wallace, and panels on the challenges faced by immigrants, migrants and refugees in San Antonio; family detention in South Texas; and the economics of immigration. We had great attendance and good questions during all the lectures and panels, which shows that the topic is timely and the student body is engaged. I’m very pleased the event was such a success.
I’m very happy to announce that I’ve been awarded tenure and promotion to Associate Professor of Philosophy at St. Mary’s University. Thank you to my colleagues in the philosophy department, the faculty in the school of humanities and social sciences, the members of academic council, and President Tom Mengler. I plan to celebrate by (finally) getting a phone number with a San Antonio area code…
It’s finally out!
And here’s the (flattering) quote from Kristi Sweet (Texas A&M) on the back:
“This book makes a timely and original contribution to Kant studies and fills a large lacuna in the literature. With exhaustive research, McQuillan demonstrates real mastery not only over Kant’s own project and texts, but also over the milieu to which he belonged.”
I’m happy to announce that I’ve now finished going through the proofs for Immanuel Kant: The Very Idea of a Critique of Pure Reason, which will appear with Northwestern University Press in June/July 2016.
Here is the official description of the book from the publisher’s website:
“Immanuel Kant: The Very Idea of a Critique of Pure Reason is a study of the background, development, exposition, and justification of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Instead of examining Kant’s arguments for the transcendental ideality of space and time, his deduction of the pure concepts of the understanding, or his account of the dialectic of human reason, J. Colin McQuillan focuses on Kant’s conception of critique. By surveying the different ways the concept of critique was used during the eighteenth century, the relationship between Kant’s critique and his pre-critical experiments with different approaches to metaphysics, the varying definitions of a critique of pure reason Kant offers in the prefaces and introductions to the first Critique, and the way Kant responds to objections, McQuillan is able to highlight an aspect of Kant’s critical philosophy that is too often overlooked—the reason that philosophy is critical.”
I’m also happy to announce that the book will be the subject of an online “Author Meets Critics” symposium on the appropriately-titled website Critique. I will announce the publication date of that symposium when it becomes available.